While attending courses of an online university during 2014, I had had an opportunity to begin following news of events in Ukraine. Amidst the momentary Twitterstorms of the crisis, in as it developed, and beside the regular assignments from the online university, I registered a domain name, MetaCommunity.info. Having registered the domain name with Gandi.net, I also began a short work journal in a form of a web log — then using the Dotclear 'blog service provided by Gandi.net — as it being a sort of generic whiteboard for the development of a web site under MetaCommunity.info. This was in parallel to the development of an informal project in ontology development, such that I had begun in a simple effort as to collect and to collate some articles of news relating to the crisis, such that might serve to explain how the crisis developed in Ukraine. Considering the crisis firstly as it marking a distinct cultural divide, furthermore in observing that the collected agencies of the UN, NATO, Russia, and other countries in the world had constantly failed in preventing the crisis' further escalation, and in viewing it from afar as a crisis event marking a broad cultural misunderstanding, beside the ongoing reports of casualties in the conflict — in viewing such a chaos from afar, though I had endeavored to keep a study of the crisis, but I myself was ultimately unable to withstand the abusive slander being hurled across social networking, beside the crisis. Thus, the work journal was not further developed. The ontologies were halted of updates. Lastly, I have altogether stopped following the commentary, in any venue The crisis in itself may be difficult enough to conscience, without any of the continual offenses of an ad homimem commentariat.
Certainly, it would be beyond me to develop a thesis immediately, as to any correlations of social networking and any events in Ukraine — or in a broader sense, events occurring fundamentally as crises of military, civil defense, and humanitarian relief elements. For all of my own short study of the crisis, but I cannot imagine any single conclusion to draw about the crisis in Ukraine, other than the bare facts of the military engagement in Ukraine — that some were attacked by some aggressors, prior to that the tone of the social networking community would continually escalate, in itself — secondly, that Russia's civil defense agency, EMERCOM has maintained a continuous stream of convoys of humanitarian aid to the communities surviving in the embattled republics of East Ukraine.
The records of the events might clearly indicate who attacked whom, in Ukraine, and at what time, should it be of any interest to military historianship. As with an untold many of the modern conventional wars, the crisis — for its survivors — might simply devolve to circumstances of humanitarian aid and disaster relief. Perhaps ultimately, local agencies may then conduct reconstruction of facilities such as can be recovered, so far as materials, tools, and expertise may permit. Beyond the material qualities of the crisis in its aftermath, the humanitarian concerns might be well addressed of religious institutions, as well as of agencies having a long experience in disaster relief. In such abstraction, the crisis might resolve to something known.
In so far as the popular media has not been reporting about the crisis, there may be as much to say of the risks faced by individual journalists endeavoring to report of the real circumstances in Ukraine. The mass censorship established by the government in Kiev, beside the altogether outrageous attacks by the Banderite insurgency in Ukraine, have created a climate entirely antagonistic to any view contrary to Kiev's party line. As well as the enumerable casualties in East Ukraine, many journalists have not returned from assignment to Ukraine.
What, then, is the origin of the conflict in Ukraine? In one quality, it may be easily believed to be like a militarized class warfare, the coal mining people and farming communities in East Ukraine attacked of an oligarchy funded primarily from international monies, the people become targets of a brutal regime bent only on keeping itself leveraged into political power in Kiev. If there may be any other qualities recognizable of the conflict, but it might obscure that single facet, to introduce any secondary thesis in this work. If it may be too easily dismissed as a thesis, but more is the difficulty of illustrating how plainly it is so.
If the crisis in Ukraine was begun of local actors, but in that it has captivated the attentions of internationally mobile militaries, it has long since escalated to a scale in which it might not be resolved in any scale smaller than of a mindfulness in international agency. The long trail of truly shadowy events leading to the emergence of the brutal "Power class," in Ukraine — it cannot be summarized in any single work of literature. Mere language does not allow for describing the breadth of such a crisis. Insofar as the crisis does not boil over to any countries beyond Ukraine, perhaps an international agency remains with a resolve sufficient to address the crisis, candidly and mindfully.
.png)